Taking another person’s life is actually a heinous crime that devastates households, communities, and society in general. The severe punishment serves being a deterrent to potential offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
However, If your same person were charged with section 300 and 302, their defence that they never intended to destroy the person – and that They only planned to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fall short, as being the elements with the offence only call for the intent to cause injury to become proven, not the intention to cause death.
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be topic to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may very well be deemed, however, we are clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject to availability of vacancy issue to your approval on the competent authority.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could probably pose a public risk. This case is additionally noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long term public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination can be a right to life itself.
In almost any society, the enforcement of law and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the list of most really serious crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is critical to guarantee justice prevails.
department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs from the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may well seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This article delves into the intricacies of your recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to supply an extensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.
In addition it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and 120 of your Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system is just not without flaws: overhauling is overdue along sexual harassment case law with the law regarding murder involves really serious reconsideration and clarification. With the time being, the minimum that can be achieved is to be certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.